Skip to main content
Carsten Felix Draschner, PhD

GenAI, what is plagiarism? Its Impact on Science. How should it be handled? What is your perspective?

Discussing the implications of GenAI on scientific work and the thin line between acceptable use and plagiarism.

Image 1

TL;DR ⏱️

Current Situation 🏫

However, I see ChatGPT being used in many researchers' work to assist in the creation of (scientific) texts. Often it is also controlled or prohibited by the controlling institutions (schools, universities, paper-venues) to use such tools.

Sample GenAI-LLM usage I think is ok (IMHO) 🤗

I wonder how the following behavior in ChatGPT should be dealt with:

These are all uses of Chat-GPT that I can imagine in the context of scientific work that was previously possible without "ChatGPT" and, in my opinion, doable with other tools without having to speak of plagiarism.

Debatable usage 🤷🏼‍♂️

More critical usage 🧐

My Questions 👨🏼‍🎓

I just ask myself how I would have worked if the tools were there or how I would want to deal with these kinds of situations as a lecturer.

Current Problem 🫣

I see lots of pressure on students and research scientists to hand in their work or to publish papers. So they are tempted to use available tools. Not every GenAI will imply plagiarism but regulations are not clear as far as I have seen.

The Chance to Research 👨🏼‍🔬

We have the chance to use GenAI for better research: acquire good information over RAG and Vector Search, Translate texts into our mother tongue, and Rewrite in shorter or clearer language or even more accessible language.... Chat interact with papers you have questions to....

We at Comma Soft AG develop GenAI solutions and also actively using such tools to create great solutions while being aware and careful about possible plagiarism issues.

#genai #plagiarism #research #artificialintelligence

LinkedIn Post